![]() |
|
| Advancing Evaluation | |
| Conversations with philanthropic leaders on strategic evaluation | Issue 2 | |
| We are happy to share with you this issue of the "Advancing Evaluation" newsletter from the Strategic Learning and Evaluation Center at FSG, which we hope will offer you
interesting ideas and points of view about evaluation. Today, we feature a conversation
with Gene Cochrane, President of The Duke Endowment, about the ways in which the
Endowment integrates evaluation into their ongoing decision-making and learning
processes. I hope to hear from you to continue the exchange at evaluation@fsg.org.
Sincerely, |
|
| Gene Cochrane, The Duke Endowment, on evaluation as culture | |
"At the Duke Endowment, our primary interest in doing evaluation is to learn and gain insights into what is working and how we can make things better; and, we see the link between evaluation and communicating findings as critical to our success. This has led us to think very differently about evaluation. We used to have a fairly
formulaic approach to evaluation that really left none of us happy. It was an appendage
to our work and it wasn't engrained in our management structure. The flow of evaluation
information stopped with our program staff. As a result, there was no way to share
what we were learning with the rest of the Endowment staff, with our board, or with
our grantees. |
![]() |
|
In recent years, we have completely changed our approach by building evaluation processes into our organizational structure. We have tried to be deliberate about integrating evaluation into all aspects of our culture in a way that is meaningful and aligned with our program strategy. The result has been the development of a strategic evaluation system that utilizes multiple evaluation approaches and methods rather than simply embracing a single, one-size-fits-all approach to evaluation. After all, our grantees are so different - from supporting 1400 rural Methodist churches to the development of highly researched national models of childcare. Communicating with our grantees about the purpose and value that evaluation brings to our combined efforts is also important. At the start of an engagement we need to be clear about what metrics we will be tracking and what we hope to gain from the evaluation so we'll know if progress is being made. We try to look at the purpose of each evaluation and identify what we hope to learn from it. We also invite our grantees working on similar projects to come together and share their progress and learnings with each other. |
|
| About FSG's Strategic Learning and Evaluation Center | |
| The Strategic Learning and Evaluation Center at FSG offers field-building and client services including tools, training, and research to introduce and support innovative evaluation practice. Click to learn more about FSG's Evaluation Center, or contact Hallie Preskill, Executive Director of the Strategic Learning and Evaluation Center. |
|
| Quick Links | |
Strategic Leaning and Evaluation Center @ FSG |
|