|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Canaliser le changement: Comment réussir l’impact collectif
Fay Hanleybrown, John Kania, Mark Kramer
Cet article fait suite à l’article initial de FSG paru dans le numéro Hiver 2011 de la Stanford Social Innovation Review. Il explore de nouveaux exemples d’impact collectif tout en donnant des conseils pratiques pour ceux cherchant à initier ou mener une telle initiative.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
|
 |
First, Make Money. Also, Do Good.
Steve Lohr
This New York Times article examines the concept of Creating Shared
Value and cites examples of corporations that are are pursuing the idea that profit-making
should be a priority of their social responsibility programs.
Learn More > |
|
 |
NS Raghavan on Way to Change Indian Philanthropy
Naren Karunakaran
Nadathur S. Raghavan's plan to chaperone Indian philanthropy from a charitable,
crisis-alleviation mode to a sector that can take on larger developmental issues. The emphasis of his strategy is to engender transformational change through collective impact.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
 |
Roundtable on Shared Value
Mark Kramer, John Kania
Executives from 10 major corporations gathered in New York City to
discuss the innovative ways that they are putting societal issues at the
core of their companies’ strategy and operations.
Learn More > |
|
|
 |
Do More Than Give
Leslie Crutchfield, John Kania, Mark Kramer
This book provides a blueprint for foundation leaders, trustees, and individual donors who want to catalyze change in the world.
Learn More > |
|
|
 |
Museum Evaluation Without Borders
Hallie Preskill
This article invites readers to think outside of evaluation’s current boundaries and to see the deep connectedness between what museums hope to achieve and how we evaluate the extent to which these aspirations may be realized.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Creating Shared Value
Michael Porter, Mark Kramer
The concept of creating ‘shared value’ focuses on the connections between societal and economic progress and has the power to unleash the next wave of global growth.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Collective Impact
Mark Kramer, John Kania
Large-scale social change requires broad cross-sector coordination, yet the social sector remains focused on the isolated intervention of individual organizations.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Lobbying for Good
Kyle Peterson, Marc Pfitzer
Companies are defying the stereotype that all corporate lobbying is self-interested by advocating for social issues that matter to business.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
|
 |
The Networked Nonprofit
Jane Wei-Skillern and Sonia Marciano
The success of some networked nonprofits suggests that organizations should focus less
on growing themselves and more on cultivating their networks.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
 |
Changing the Game
Mark Kramer, John Kania
Companies that get into the CSR game and play to win will reap disproportionate social impact, economic rewards, and reputational benefits.
Learn More > |
|
|
 |
Scaling Social Impact
Mark Kramer
The business metaphor has imprisoned much new thinking in the social sector – and the limitations are most apparent in this widespread ambition, shared by many funders and nonprofit leaders alike, of “going to scale” through rapid organizational growth.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Leading Boldly
Ronald Heifetz, John Kania, Mark Kramer
Foundations can enhance the impact of their traditional approaches to social change by harnessing imaginative and even controversial leadership. This Stanford Social Innovation Review article focuses on how Adaptive Leadership can be applied to complex social challenges.
Learn More > |
|
|
 |
Aspiring to a Plan - And Acheiving It
Owen Stearns
This article features an interview with Wendy Ault, the Executive Director of the MELMAC Foundation, and in which she talks about the problem they faced and the process FSG and MELMAC went through together to create a strategic plan.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
 |
The Evaluation Matrix
Mark Kramer
Evaluation is one of the most confusing topics in philanthropy – in part because it embraces multiple definitions that are often jumbled together.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Benchmarking Philanthropy
John Kania
Benchmarking philanthropic performance against industry peers is
extremely helpful in finding ways to increase both the business and
social benefit of every dollar the company contributes.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Doing More With Less
Mark Kramer, Sarah Cooch, Owen Stearns
How one financial services company dramatically enhanced its social
impact by focusing less than half of its giving on a strategic
initiative.
Learn More > |
|
 |
CSR - A Religion with Too Many Priests?
Michael Porter
In this interview, Michael Porter discusses corporate philanthropy, the implications for corporate competitiveness and calls for academics to provide a conceptual framework for the topic.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A Different View on Community Funds
Mark Kramer
In this letter to the editor, Kramer takes exception to an article in
the Chronicle of Philanthropy--and argues that the most successful
community foundations will be those that respond simultaneously to the
needs of their community and their donors.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Paying the Price of Innovation
Mark Kramer, John Kania
Our communities would be poorer were community foundations to forego the
rich range of services they provide. On the other hand, community
foundations cannot be expected to sustain these services without paying
for them somehow.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
 |
Helping to Prevent a Culture of Inadequacy
Mark Kramer
Foundations often complain about the inefficiency and “lack of scale” that characterize many of the small organizations they support. Yet seldom do they recognize that
their own philosophy of giving may be one cause of the problem.
Learn More > |
|
 |
Grantmakers Shouldn't Play with Matches
Mark Kramer
Making a matching grant seems like the easiest way for a foundation to
get the most “leverage” from its giving. However, the
leverage, or added value, of a matching grant is often only illusory.
Learn More > |
|
|
|
 |
Mixed Motives
Mark Kramer
Any donor's giving has multiple motivations. In this piece, Kramer
argues that there are three primary motivational categories of giving and that by establishing budgets for each type
and consciously considering one's motivations, donors can
improve their impact.
Learn More > |
|